[meteorite-list] Temporary Names

From: capricorn89 <capricorn89_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:44:36 2004
Message-ID: <000901c0a874$665086c0$df36b2d1_at_earthlink.net>

re: naming unclassifieds:

While most of my NWA's are classified, information re: a few unclassifieds,
both in the permanent collection and some that I have sold, are archived
where anyone on the planet can see them. The archive link is at the bottom
of my meteorite homepage at www.meteorite1.com. (Its called "access NWA
archive") In it you will see a specimen ID No., (which will not carry a NWA
designation unless there will be a honest intent to have it classified
later), disposition (in the collection or sold), a full description AND A
PICTURE of the specimen. Purchasers receive a certificate of authentication
with my signature and my embossment stamp. They can cross-reference this
with the archive information if a buyer ever wants to resell the specimen.
If any of you should purchase one of these, it will always be there to

Ron Hartman

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Beauford <wendirob_at_laplaza.org>
To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Temporary Names

> It hadn't even occured to me that it might confuse someone, but what you
> below makes me realize I should probably make a public announcment. I am
> using a series of unique temporary names for any unnamed unclassified
> meteorites that I receive. These are NWARB and then a sequential number.
> NWA is the sadly limited locational information. RB is my initials (yes!
> accountability!) because I have the records of purchase, and sale where
> possible, and the main mass of anything that might be rare. This is just
> make it easier to track me down for what info I might provide. Numbers
> from 1 to whatever. I try not to sell any meteorite without a temporary
> name tag. Why? It is a responsibility. I cannot prevent the confusion,
> inaccuracy, and lack of relevant information at the source, but I can at
> least make sure future cuts from the masses are identifiable as being from
> the same body, that the university that I donate to can refer meaningfully
> to a mass that I or someone else might have more of, and that anyone in
> future can at least attempt to find out more information about a given
> piece. I don't expect the Meteoritical society to use these names, but I
> will at least make sure that I don't complicate their job... and that any
> further associated fragments resulting from division of the samples I sell
> or donate can be recorded and associated when they do name them.
> Why NWARB? Noone else is using it, so it will be immediately evident and
> won't perpetuate this massive confusion by duplicating someones field
> or any official names.
> Hope this is useful.
> -Robert Beauford
> > >Dean and list
> > >
> > > I hope that you have these names given by the Met Soc.
> > >Otherwise you overpassed your rights: there is scientific society
> > >the
> > >METEORITISCAL SOCIETY that is in charge of giving names to meteorites
> such
> > >NWA.
> > >
> > >Please do not confuse everbody's mind with such a behaviour, specially
> > >newbees.
> > >
> > >My 2 chondrules
> > >
> > >
> > >Michel FRANCO
> > >100 Chemin des Campènes
> > >74400 CHAMONIX - FRANCE
> _______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 09 Mar 2001 03:39:04 AM PST

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb