[meteorite-list] Life's Rocky Road Between Worlds
From: David Weir <dgweir_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:44:12 2004 Message-ID: <3B26775F.322E796D_at_earthlink.net> Ron replied: > The main difference is the amount of time the samples spend in space enroute > to Earth. For the typical Mars meteorite, it would have been in space for 15 > to 30 millions years before it landed on Earth. For a sample returned by > spacecraft, the sample would only spend a few months in space enclosed in a > container. Any Mars organisms, if present, would have a much higher likelihood > of surviving the trip from Mars to Earth in a spacecraft than in a Mars meteorite. I included the particular quote from the article in part to dispell that very argument. They have already calculated the 7% microbe survival rate in the 150 kg of hospitable rocks per year to derive their equivalent 10 kg per year number. So that is not a sufficient reason to worry. Quoting again: > > "The long term average transfer rate of 150kg of hospitable rocks per > > year, > > with 7% of resident microbes surviving (if any were present in the rocks > > at > > the time of launch), is equivalent to a series of space missions that > > return samples of about 10 kg of Martian rocks each year under protected > > conditions that are favourable to the survival of any life within the > > rocks." Ron also writes: > To date, we haven't found any surviving microprobes in any of the Mars meteorites. > ALH84001 only involved potential microfossils. Okay, that's further reason not to worry. You're helping my case now. David Received on Tue 12 Jun 2001 04:11:11 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |