[meteorite-list] UNCUT NWAs (was, "Unclassified NWAs")
From: MeteorHntr_at_aol.com <MeteorHntr_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:42:03 2004 Message-ID: <6.1133e9ae.27a0881d_at_aol.com> --part1_6.1133e9ae.27a0881d_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 1/24/01 1:11:56 PM Central Standard Time,=20 ROBERT.D.MATSON_at_saic.com writes: > We're talking about *location* fraud, not meteorwrong > fraud.=A0 If an unscrupulous individual purchases an > uncut, unclassified Moroccan meteorite, and then months > or even years later "rediscovers" this meteorite in, > say, Utah -- NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO TELL.=A0 I discussed > this very scenario with Alan Rubin yesterday, and he > said it is certainly plausible, and could quite possibly > have already happened. >=20 >=20 List, et al., Check out the new Catalogue under Nova 001, Nova 002, Nova 003. In fact Nova 003 was reported to have been found in UTAH as Robert=20 hypothetically suggested above. Seems to me if meteorite collecting was banned world wide, then there would=20 be no dealers. The only hunters would be official government hunters, and=20 thus there would be no profit motive and thus there would be no fraud. =20 Sounds like an easy solution to me. Steve --part1_6.1133e9ae.27a0881d_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2>In a message dated 1/24/0= 1 1:11:56 PM Central Standard Time,=20 <BR>ROBERT.D.MATSON_at_saic.com writes: <BR> <BR> <BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-= LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">We're talking about *locati= on* fraud, not meteorwrong <BR>fraud.=A0 If an unscrupulous individual purchases an <BR>uncut, unclassified Moroccan meteorite, and then months <BR>or even years later "rediscovers" this meteorite in, <BR>say, Utah -- NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO TELL.=A0 I discussed <BR>this very scenario with Alan Rubin yesterday, and he <BR>said it is certainly plausible, and could quite possibly <BR>have already happened. <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Ar= ial" LANG=3D"0"></BLOCKQUOTE> <BR> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Ar= ial" LANG=3D"0"> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Ar= ial" LANG=3D"0"> <BR></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Ar= ial" LANG=3D"0"> <BR> <BR>List, et al., <BR> <BR>Check out the new Catalogue under Nova 001, Nova 002, Nova 003. <BR> <BR>In fact Nova 003 was reported to have been found in UTAH as Robert=20 <BR>hypothetically suggested above. <BR> <BR>Seems to me if meteorite collecting was banned world wide, then there wo= uld=20 <BR>be no dealers. The only hunters would be official government hunte= rs, and=20 <BR>thus there would be no profit motive and thus there would be no fraud. &= nbsp; <BR>Sounds like an easy solution to me. <BR> <BR>Steve</FONT></HTML> --part1_6.1133e9ae.27a0881d_boundary-- Received on Wed 24 Jan 2001 02:33:49 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |