[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BCCmtrites
- To: Impactika@aol.com, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: BCCmtrites
- From: Sharkkb8@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 01:36:57 EDT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 01:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <OKnJBD.A.e4.dCWC4@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
> Is it real or are they pulling our collective leg?
Just the fact that this question can be so rightly ASKED seems
like reason enough for plenty of winking & skepticism. (Can you say
"Emerald?" Can you say "Bran Muffin?") I wrote them a nice,
polite note asking who performed the following...
<< This sample was originally identified as a transitional main group
anomalous but in April of 1999, it was reclassified with new chemical
analysis. >>
...as well as asking them what the Meteoritical Society had to say about
them. Shall we all report when/if any replies are received....?!
Gregory
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------