[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Water Ice Detected From Lunar Prospector Impact
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: No Water Ice Detected From Lunar Prospector Impact
- From: Ron Baalke <BAALKE@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 15:30:18 GMT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:32:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <s7EKjD.A.H_F.pWKB4@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Douglas Isbell
Headquarters, Washington, DC Oct. 13, 1999
(Phone: 202/358-1547)
David Morse
Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
(Phone: 650/604-4724)
Becky Rische
University of Texas at Austin
(Phone: 512/471-7272)
RELEASE: 99-119
NO WATER ICE DETECTED FROM LUNAR PROSPECTOR IMPACT
The controlled crash of NASA's Lunar Prospector
spacecraft into a crater near the south pole of the Moon
on July 31 produced no observable signature of water,
according to scientists digging through data from Earth-
based observatories and spacecraft such as the Hubble
Space Telescope.
This lack of physical evidence leaves open the
question of whether ancient cometary impacts delivered
ice that remains buried in permanently shadowed regions
of the Moon, as suggested by the large amounts of
hydrogen measured indirectly from lunar orbit by Lunar
Prospector during its main mapping mission.
Research group leaders from the University of Texas
at Austin announced their results today at the annual
meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Division
for Planetary Sciences meeting in Padua, Italy.
In a low-budget attempt to wring one last bit of
scientific productivity from the low-cost Lunar
Prospector mission, NASA worked with engineers and
astronomers at the University of Texas to precisely crash
the barrel-shaped spacecraft into a specific shadowed
crater. NASA accepted the team's proposal based on
successful scientific peer review of the idea and the
pending end of the spacecraft's useful life, although the
chances of positive detection of water were judged to be
less than 10 percent.
Worldwide observations of the crash were focused
primarily on using sensitive spectrometers tuned to look
for the ultraviolet emission lines expected from the
hydroxyl (OH) molecules that should be a by-product of
any icy rock and dust kicked up by the impact of the 354-
pound spacecraft.
"There are several possible explanations why we did
not detect any water signature, and none of them can
really be discounted at this time," said Dr. Ed Barker,
assistant director of the university's McDonald
Observatory at UT Austin, who coordinated the observing
campaign. These explanations include:
* the spacecraft might have missed the target area;
* the spacecraft might have hit a rock or dry soil at
the target site;
* water molecules may have been firmly bound in rocks as
hydrated mineral as opposed to existing as free ice
crystals, and the crash lacked enough energy to separate
water from hydrated minerals;
* no water exists in the crater and the hydrogen
detected by the Lunar Prospector spacecraft earlier is
simply pure hydrogen;
* studies of the impact's physical outcome were
inadequate;
* the parameters used to model the plume that resulted
from the impact were inappropriate;
* the telescopes used to observe the crash, which have a
very small field of view, may not have been pointed
correctly;
* water and other materials may not have risen above the
crater wall or otherwise were directed away from the
telescopes' view.
Although the crash did not confirm the existence of
water ice on the Moon, "this high-risk, potentially high-
payoff experiment did produce several benefits," said Dr.
David Goldstein, the aerospace engineer who led the UT
Austin team. "We now have experience building a
remarkably complex, coordinated observing program with
astronomers across the world, we established useful upper
limits on the properties of the Moon's natural
atmosphere, and we tested a possible means of true 'lunar
prospecting' using direct impacts."
Lunar Prospector was launched on Jan. 6, 1998, from
Cape Canaveral Air Station, FL, aboard an Athena 2
rocket. In March 1998, mission scientists announced
their first tentative findings of the presence of water
ice in shadowed craters near the Moon's south and north
poles. They estimated later that up to six billion
metric tons of water ice may be buried in these craters
under about 18 inches of soil, in more concentrated
deposits than originally thought. However, the evidence
was indirect, they cautioned, based on reasonable
scientific assumptions given the levels of hydrogen
detected, from which water ice is inferred.
Since then, Prospector data have also been used to
develop the first precise gravity map of the entire lunar
surface. While the Moon's magnetic field is relatively
weak, Prospector has confirmed the presence of local
magnetic fields that create the two smallest
magnetospheres in the Solar System. Another scientific
landmark is the assembly of the first global maps of the
Moon's elemental composition.
The $63 million Lunar Prospector mission was led by
Dr. Alan Binder of the Lunar Research Institute, Tucson,
AZ, and managed by NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett
Field, CA. It was built by Lockheed Martin Missiles &
Space, Sunnyvale, CA. Other participating organizations
included the Department of Energy's Los Alamos National
Laboratory, NM, and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center,
Greenbelt, MD, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena,
CA.
-end-
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------