[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The outer planets
- To: "Ron Baalke" <BAALKE@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>, <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Subject: Re: The outer planets
- From: "jjswaim" <MissionControl@email.msn.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 22:10:09 -0500
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 22:14:37 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <9WtcD.A.8dE.AMOK4@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Baalke <BAALKE@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: The outer planets
|>My question is, could Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, have been large
|>comets themselves before coming to an inactive or dormant state known as a
|>gaseous 'planet'?
|
|Probably not, since the bulk of the gaseous planets are helium and
hydrogen,
|which is quite different from the makeup of a comet.
Admittedly, comets do not have sufficient gravitational force to retain all
of their gases, as do the large 'planets'.
|Also, the gaseous planets are not inactive, nor are they dormant.
I was not referring to them as inactive or dormant in terms of their
existence as a 'planet', rather inactive as a comet travelling the galaxy.
In that sense, they would be considered kaput, but very active at the same
time:-)
Thank you, Ron. As always, it's been a pleasure.
Julia
|
|----------
|Archives located at:
|http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
|
|For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
|http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
|----------
|
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------