[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Subscription to the meteorite list

To: "J. Warren" <warr@arn.net>
Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
From: "P.Craig" <peric@extremezone.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 12:03:43 -0700
CC: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>, meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
References: <016601bebb4d$502795c0$e591fecc@pavilion>
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 15:02:46 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <hXgM1B.A.4cG.kqTb3@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Hey ... I'm on the "don't remove" team. Lets try to get the facts straight Joel
"The Judge" Warren! And I'm only responding to you on-list because you mailed
this to me on-list. If you want to continue this OFF list, go for it.
Peri Craig

J. Warren wrote:

> The whole issue started when someone who thinks that their sh*t don't stink
> and had a holier than thou attitude called for the removal of someone from
> this list due to a topic.  I gladly pointed out that this person had quite a
> stinker a few months ago.  POINT being, don't accuse someone of something
> and call for their removal when you are as guilty if not more so.  Think
> before you type.  ITS DARN ANNOYING to us who are the true and just in this
> world! ;)  So, you will hear no more from me on this UNLESS i have to defend
> my actions again or hang some more "mine stinks too" signs on someones back.
> Adios!
>
> Joel
>
> P.S.  And if i receive any more mail from Julia or Peri (aka Cagney and
> Lacy)  i will not send any more mail to the list regarding this.  And thanks
> to all who mailed me off list :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: P.Craig <peric@extremezone.com>
> To: J. Warren <warr@arn.net>
> Cc: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>; meteorite-list
> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 1:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
>
> >I thought there was enough maturity here to let bygones be bygones.
> Apparently I
> >was incorrect. Julia (and everyone ELSE involved in that thread) have long
> since
> >apoligized, and everyone ELSE seemed o.k. with that. Geez ... now you're
> >resorting to THIS? Seems like, since this is no longer an issue, any
> continuance
> >of the re-hashing is REALLY off-target ... and irrelevant!
> >Peri Craig
> >
> >J. Warren wrote:
> >
> >> Julia wrote:
> >>
> >> >Now the list has made it's wishes clearly known.  There are children who
> >> >want to learn about meteorites on the internet.  Please do not keep
> >> >repeating this as you are the offender now.
> >>
> >> WOW!  There are children who want to learn about meteorites on the
> internet
> >> now??  I'm sure glad there weren't any when you were discussing your
> PENIS
> >> SHAPED TETKITE AND METEORITE RANCH.  But since there are NOW children on
> the
> >> internet who want to learn about meteorites.....i must, as Bill Clinton
> >> would say, refrain from discussing JULIA'S past subject of meteorite
> >> sex......... For the Children.
> >>
> >> Joel
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>
> >> To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> >> Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 12:30 PM
> >> Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
> >>
> >> >It was a Glorieta.
> >> >
> >> >Now the list has made it's wishes clearly known.  There are children who
> >> >want to learn about meteorites on the internet.  Please do not keep
> >> >repeating this as you are the offender now.
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: J. Warren <warr@arn.net>
> >> >To: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>; meteorite-list
> >> ><meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; Phil Bagnall
> >> ><phil@ticetboo.demon.co.uk>
> >> >Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 1:01 PM
> >> >Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >|Julia,
> >> >|    Boy, some of the words and phrases you using in this thread are as
> big
> >> >|as that PENIS SHAPED TEKTITE ON THAT METEORITE RANCH that you use to
> >> >|discuss!!!!
> >> >|
> >> >|
> >> >|Joel  :)
> >> >|
> >> >|P.S. Happy to fathers day to all that it applies to!!!!!
> >> >|
> >> >|
> >> >|-----Original Message-----
> >> >|From: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>
> >> >|To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; Phil Bagnall
> >> >|<phil@ticetboo.demon.co.uk>
> >> >|Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 11:29 AM
> >> >|Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
> >> >|
> >> >|
> >> >|>
> >> >|>jjswaim wrote:
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>|> and these
> >> >|>|>boundaries are flimsy and easily penetrable for discussion.  I'd
> still
> >> >|>like
> >> >|>|>to see a wider range of multidisiplinary discussions, but I'm not
> going
> >> >|to
> >> >|>|>push it.  At least we can now include astrophysics , astrobiology,
> >> solar
> >> >|>|>system formation, etc. which used to be a no-no.
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>|Phil Bagnall wrote:
> >> >|>
> >> >|>|One the one hand you seem to be saying that we have a set of rules
> that
> >> >we
> >> >|>|should all stick to and ban anyone who does not, and yet on the other
> >> >hand
> >> >|>|you are saying that we should bend the rules if and when we feel like
> >> it.
> >> >|>|Come on Julia, you can't have it both ways!
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>Yes I can:-)  Very little is mutually exclusive and I'm surprised I
> >> wasn't
> >> >|>challenged on that a while ago on one of my postings.  But that's
> another
> >> >|>subject.
> >> >|>
> >> >|>My above statement was in response to your question, "Where do we draw
> >> the
> >> >|>line?"   You were saying that no line should be drawn and I was
> telling
> >> >you
> >> >|>where I draw it.  This, however, does not mean that the list has to
> draw
> >> >it
> >> >|>the same place I do.  In fact, as I pointed out,  I pushed the line as
> >> far
> >> >|>as I thought reasonable, worthwhile, and beneficial in the name of
> >> >science.
> >> >|>(Yes, as a human being I love to joke around as well and certainly
> found
> >> >|the
> >> >|>boundary of subject matter to joke about:-)
> >> >|>
> >> >|>The dynamics of this list are ever changing as are scientific
> discoveries
> >> >|>and theories.  It therefore behooves us to continually reevaluate both
> >> the
> >> >|>rules of the list and our individual thinking on these scientific
> >> matters.
> >> >|>I am hoping common sense will prevail and that it is indeed possible
> to
> >> >|have
> >> >|>boundaries so that this precious list does not become commonplace.
> There
> >> >|>are so many others that are.  I say protect what we have judiciously.
> >> >|>
> >> >|>Best regards,
> >> >|>Julia
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>|
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|>----------
> >> >|>Archives located at:
> >> >|>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
> >> >|>
> >> >|>For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> >> >|>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> >> >|>----------
> >> >|>
> >> >|>
> >> >|
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >----------
> >> >Archives located at:
> >> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
> >> >
> >> >For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> >> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> >> >----------
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ----------
> >> Archives located at:
> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
> >>
> >> For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> >> ----------
> >
> >
> >
> >



----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------

References:

Re: Subscription to the meteorite list

From: "J. Warren" <warr@arn.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
Next by Date: Test for nickel and murcury
Prev by thread: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
Next by thread: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread