[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nakhla
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Nakhla
- From: Matt Morgan <mhmeteorites@geocities.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:47:14 -0600
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Organization: MHM
- References: <3973e1f3.2497b0ee@aol.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 09:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ySXVmD.A.XxB.7klZ3@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
To all of those who have ordered Nakhla from me (yes I am the one, my
hand goes up), apparently it did NOT kill a dog, so I am sorry. I read
that years ago, not only in Haag's catalog (where I believe it said
"Gack...bow wow wow!"), but in various other pubs. Sorry for the mix-up
and I didn't type it to generate sales, Nakhla does that by itself....
--
Matt Morgan
Mile High Meteorites
http://www.mhmeteorites.com
P.O.Box 151293
Lakewood, CO 80215-9293
MARSROX@aol.com wrote:
>
> Perhaps it really doesn't matter, but a second meteorite dealer is offering
> Nakhla for sale with the punchline of "when it fell, it killed a dog - ouch!"
>
> Nakhla is my "favorite" meteorite for many reasons. As meteorites go, it's
> beautiful. A fresh cut surface seems to glow under even small magnification.
> Scientists have found more evidence of life on another planet - what other
> meteorite in your collection has that profound cache' ? It's from Mars, a
> somewhat more exotically romantic origin than say....4Vesta. It's got
> incredible legend behind it - first Egyptian meteorite, studied by some of
> the most historic meteoriticists in history, stolen from the Egyptians by a
> person posing as a Yale professor, even Monica Grady adds to the prestige of
> this rock with her donation last year of a specimen from the BNHM collection.
>
>
> But friends, it did not kill a dog. And the long published typo of the TKW
> "forty stones of forty kilos" is wrong - there's only 9.9K. I'm a tad
> sensitive on this subject having written about Nakhla in Meteorite! last year
> (May and August issues). Since the two dealers plagiarizing Bob Haag's
> catalogue description of Nakhla (double - ouch!) advertise in M! it seems a
> safe assumption that they also subscribe and read it. Perhaps "dead dogs"
> sell more meteorites, but what's the point of publishing research, reviewed
> by people like Hap McSween and Alan Rubin, if we are to ignore the results?
>
> Kevin Kichinka
>
> ----------
> Archives located at:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
>
> For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> ----------
--
Matt Morgan
Mile High Meteorites
http://www.mhmeteorites.com
P.O.Box 151293
Lakewood, CO 80215-9293
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------
References: