[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A Hoax Involving Orgueil?
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: A Hoax Involving Orgueil?
- From: WBranchsb@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 02:43:39 EDT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 1999 02:45:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <Pt8KnB.A.FCD.QHgY3@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Hello Eveyone,
In the second edition of Harry McSween's Meteorites and Their Parent Planets,
McSween briefly (perhaps too briefly) reviews claims of past researchers of
microfossils and "organized elements" in carbonaceous chondrites as being
evidence for biological in origin. McSween goes on to state that
essentially, terrestrial contamination appears to account more parsimoniously
for the laboratory results but on page 74 he states "At least one example in
the Orgueil (France) meteorite appears to have been an elaborate hoax."
I am unfamiliar with this "hoax" which by definition indicates a deliberate
attempt to misrepresent or otherwise falsify data. This is very different
from simply different scientists interpreting the same data in different ways
or an otherwise well intentioned experimenter not controlling for different
independent variables (e.g., terrestrial contamination). I mean, a hoax is a
hoax!
Does anyone know the particulars surrounding this hoax? Who were the
participants and how did they attempt to pull off the hoax? When did it
occur? How was the hoax revealed? Burke (1986) goes into a much more in
depth literature review of the analysis of organic matter as evidence for
fossil organisms in meteorites as well as terrestrial contamination
interpretations (particularly pages 312-315) but he does not mention anything
about a "hoax."
Any information would be appreciated. As well, if anyone has Dr. McSween's
email address at the University of Tennessee please send it to me.
BTW, if you have no read it, McSween's book is highly recommended. Very
readable and almost conversational at times. Burke (Cosmic Debris:
Meteorites in History, 1986) is also highly recommended for a more scholarly
approach to the history of meteorites.
Regards,
-Walter Branch
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------
Follow-Ups: