[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Close-Call Asteroid Coming
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Close-Call Asteroid Coming
- From: "E. L. Jones" <jonee@epix.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:17:14 +0000
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- References: <990528232625.23607156@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov> <374F6423.160B@access1.net>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:12:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <PF4Fz.A.1BB.naqU3@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Hello Michael, Ron, and List,
Here are a few "facts" about the subject I gleaned from my readings.
Tunguska knocked down trees in a 1000-1300 square kilometer area but did not disrupt any ecosystems. In comparison ,I recall that Mount St. Helens took out 20-30 square miles.
A 1 km diameter asteroid would release 7,500 Megatons of equivalent TNT in other terms 15 BILLION Hiroshima type bombs and a casualty level of 1-1.2 Billion Humans. Close but not a Extinction Level Event (ELE) for humans. A serious reduction in demand for computers, however, a boon in demand for hammer and chisel and cave art in some cultures.....
Just wanted to pass those figures along. Have a good Memorial Day.
Regards,
Elton
Michael Blood wrote:
>
> >This would be like another Tunguska, wouldn't it?
> ---
> No, 1999 AN10 is in the PHA category and about 1 km in diameter. It
> would do major damage if it hit the Earth.
> Ron Baalke
> ---
> Ron,
> I am confused. You do NOT consider Tunguska "major damage?"
> The 65 MYA dynosaur exterminator (as well as about 65 to 75% of all
> life on earth) was extimated to be 6 km in diameter.
> However, 1 km has "only" a very small fraction of the mass of a 6 km
> body.
> Personally, I consider Tunguska to have caused ultra major damage (what
> was it? Flattened 10,000 square miles?) - however, it was in a nearly
> unpopulated area - it certainly would have entirely obliterated any
> major city on earth. However, relative to a 6 km diameter body, 1 km is
> "relatively" "small." "Major," yes, but still significantly less so than
> the impact of the 65myo Yucatan impact. So, what IS the estimated
> impact ?
> Best wishes, Michael
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------
References: