[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Meteorite "worth" (warning: long and opinionated!)
- To: ams000@aztec.asu.edu, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Meteorite "worth" (warning: long and opinionated!)
- From: Sharkkb8@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 04:27:00 EDT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: Sharkkb8@aol.com
- Resent-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 04:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"xz9GkB.A.auF.VEHC3"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Gregory:
<< Everything's worth is determined by supply and demand. The cost of
>production/extraction is simply a key component of "supply". >>
Steve:
<<WRONG ! With gold, platinum, or silver, the cost of production is
what the intrinsic value of that commodity is. >>
So assuming exactly the same production cost, the price of gold during
HIGH demand will be EXACTLY the same as when demand is low?
Don't think so. Take a look at the price of gold over the last twenty years.
Prices fluctuated wildly while extraction costs remained virtually unchanged.
The price of gold skyrocketed, and then came back to Earth. Are you telling
me that, first, production was cheap-and-easy, then it was unbelievably
difficult-and-expensive, and then it was cheap-and-easy again, and THAT'S why
the price of gold
was low, then soared, and then fell? C'mon.
It was changes in demand that sent the prices up, then stabilized them.
Production-cost is a sometimes-important factor of supply, but you don't have
the complete economic waltz without the demand variable.
Steve:
<<You just proved my point by using "beanie baby". They are not worth more
than the cloth they are made of, you say. >>
No, I said precisely the opposite. I said that they are not worth more than
the cloth TO ME, but that MY opinion, as a non-participant, doesn't count.
Beanie babies ARE worth more than the cloth to the only people who matter,
the people who BUY them. THEY determine the price/worth.
How could I have proved your point with beanie babies? Your point was:
<<the cost of production is what the intrinsic value of that commodity is>>
There is the tiniest of production-cost for a beanie baby, certainly nothing
to
justify a $500 price tag. It is the demand that forces the prices where they
are.
Now, those of us outside of the beanie-baby-world may think that the demand
is foolish, that the prices are foolish, but the fact remains, the demand
EXISTS
among enough people, and the prices reflect it. The price of anything is
determined by what
people actually buy and sell it for, not by what a non-buyer
thinks the prices OUGHT to be.
<<Gold has intrinsic value....meteorites do not.
Put a piece of gold next to a piece of Zagami and leave them on a sidewalk.
Which one do you think will stay there untouched>>
The Zagami will stay there untouched, until a meteorite collector/dealer
walks by.
And THEY are the ones who determine the Zagami's worth, not the 1,000 people
who pick up the gold and keep walking.
Gold has value because people demand it. Another metal with PRECISELY the
same production cost that gold has, could very well be 1/100th the price,
because
there is not the same demand.
I think part of the reason we differ is rooted in semantics.
To me, "worth" or "price" are objective
market terms. The "worth" of a share of General Motors is a definite price
at any
given moment. Some people think it's too high, some think it's too low,
that's why
people constantly buy/sell, and that defines a "market". You keep
referring to
"intrinsic" value - less objective, and intrinsic value rarely parallels
market value.
Antiques are *worth* more than old wood. Theater tickets are *worth* more
than
cardboard. Autographed baseballs are *worth* more than a baseball and a
little
ink. And meteorites are *worth* more than stone/scrap iron. Intrinsic
value and market value usually don't have much to do with each other, or all
beanie babies and meteorites would cost 50 cents. Which they don't.
<< I do determine the price of meteorites-- That is I decide what I will or
will
not buy>>
Well, fine, more power TO you. I make the same decisions. Everybody does.
But where we all choose to set our own individual buying limits is hardly the
same thing as the overall, prevailing rate for meteorites, the "big picture".
I might decide that, FOR ME, $35-a-share is too much to pay for Disney
stock, but that doesn't make it true for the every stock market investor.
You can determine YOUR price, but you can't determine THE price. Only the
broad, overall market can do that.
<<Meteorites ....will then be a rich man's hobby-->>
You say you've been collecting/dealing for 20 years. (I confess, I'm only at
about 15)
So at the beginning of your involvement, you could no doubt buy lots of stuff
for way-
less-than-a-dollar-a-gram, right? How about the guy who was around 30 years
before YOU? HE'S thinking, "Man, this stuff's only worth a dollar-a-POUND,
and here comes this guy Steve who's paying way more than I EVER did".
Should he have looked at you and said, "YOU are turning this into a rich
man's hobby"?
After all, YOU paid waaaaaay more than HE thought meteorites were "worth".
Interested in your response.
Gregory
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------