[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proofread For Accuracy - Please

To: rmarlin@network-one.com, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: Proofread For Accuracy - Please
From: FusionCrst@aol.com
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 21:27:00 EDT
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Reply-To: FusionCrst@aol.com
Resent-Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 21:29:36 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"rZP2mB.A.IBH.bHBC3"@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

In a message dated 4/4/99 9:28:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
rmarlin@network-one.com writes:

<< I didn't see any obvious mistakes, but in the original letter you might 
have
 done more to grab their interest. Giving the impression that meteorites are
 actually findable, like mentioning GB, which was found by metal detectorists
 but frequently mistaken for 'hot rocks' and tossed out, would grab their
 attention. >>

This will definitely be added to the letter, Thanks Gene :-)
George Nicula

----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------

Prev by Date: Re: Proofread For Accuracy - Please
Next by Date: Re: Fw: Meteorite "worth"
Prev by thread: Re: Proofread For Accuracy - Please
Next by thread: Re: King Tut's Tektite - Libyan Desert Glass Petrogenesis Debated
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread