[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad Meteorite Laws - Correction.
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Bad Meteorite Laws - Correction.
- From: MeteorHntr <MeteorHntr@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 15:44:33 EDT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 15:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"3Atde.A.ByD.LjHa1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
In a message dated 5/24/98 10:44:28 AM Central Daylight Time,
MeteorHntr@aol.com writes:
<<
I think this issue is so ripe for a challenge in a court. Personally I think
if this president could be changed
it would be one of the greatest things for
the meteoritical community (albeit the Smithsonian wouldn't like it to much).
>>
-------------------------------
Sorry list,
I know most of you will understand my typo of saying "president" when I meant
to say "precedent." However, since I did toss in a Clinton joke a few days
ago, I thought I had better be sure that everyone understood, that I do not
feel President Bill Clinton "needs to be changed"...
...Well, I do think he needs to be changed, but that has absolutely nothing to
do with meteorites or what I meant to say! (Maybe it WAS a Freudian Slip!).
Anyway, I was talking about judges decisions based on PRECEDING judges
rulings, not with who is sitting in the White House.
Sorry for the confusion, and I hope I didn't just make things even worse!
Steve Arnold