[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PETROLOGIC/PETROGRAPHIC GRADE 5
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: PETROLOGIC/PETROGRAPHIC GRADE 5
- From: Bernd Pauli <bernd.pauli@lehrer1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 20:38:22 +0100
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:41:57 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"lz631D.A.yRE.80tC1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Walter wrote:
> Thanks for the help on the p e t r o l o g i c grade question...
Frank wrote:
> The term p e t r o l o g i c is really a misnomer, as it implies a
> chemistry related identification.
> It really should be considered a p e t r o g r a p h i c
> classification, as it is in terms of descriptive observation...
Hello Frank, hello Walter, hello List Members!
Thank you, Frank, for the clarifying statements. When the email arrived,
I was just busy appending the 145 newly classified Antarctic Meteorites
from AMN 21-1, 1998 (Antarctic Meteorite Newsletter) to my database. And
right there, on page 9, you can read: P E T R O G R A P H I C
DESCRIPTIONS.
Best wishes, Bernd