[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Relative Ages of CAIs vs. Chondrules

To: "'Meteorite List'" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Subject: Relative Ages of CAIs vs. Chondrules
From: Steven Excell <excell@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 15:08:53 -0800
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 18:13:59 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"TksQ1D.A.oqG.z5I_0"@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Does anyone have any recent references to literature on the relative ages of calcium-aluminum inclusions (CAIs) vs. chondrules within chondritic meteorites?

I have some older reference materials (1960s and 1970s) by Wood, Faul, et al that are now dated.  Clearly, CAIs are older than chondrules.  What I'm looking for is a good paper(s) that narrows down the difference in ages (age ranges?) for each, based upon the most current research on this issue.

Thanks, in advance, for any info any of you may have.

Steve
Seattle, Washington USA
excell@cris.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: Relative Ages of CAIs vs. Chondrules

From: Bernd Pauli <bernd.pauli@lehrer1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Prev by Date: Re: are we alone?
Next by Date: Re: are we alone? (slime molds and other primitive life included)
Prev by thread: Re: are we alone? (slime molds and other primitive life included)
Next by thread: Re: Relative Ages of CAIs vs. Chondrules
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread