[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Old vs. New Classification of Irons
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Old vs. New Classification of Irons
- From: MeteorHntr <MeteorHntr@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 16:05:57 EST
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 16:09:14 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"mdtmpB.A.eM.mDH_0"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Thanks for the Referrals (below.)
I couldn't help but get a big laugh out of some of the posts I found (while
finding the Iron info) talking about how quite the list was!!!! Here is an
example from 10 months ago:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's only quiet if we allow it to be.
This list should NOT be limited to deep scientific questions or
announcements.
Added anything really neat to your collection lately? ... post it here ...
I'm sure others would like to hear about it (I know I would). This list is
an excellent tool for communications with other meteorite enthusiasts AROUND
THE WORLD.
-----------------------------------------
I guess people have to complain no matter what is (or is not) being said!
Back then they were trying to get people to talk and it seems now everyone
wants people to shut up! Go figure!?!?!?
Steve Arnold
In a message dated 98-03-03 15:36:05 EST, you write:
<<
As for the new classification system, look at Frank Stroik's
contributions to this list:
1) Re: Iron Meteorite Classification. Part I (/Mar97/msg00049.html)
2) Re: Iron Meteorite Classification. Part II (/Mar97/msg00066.html)
3) Re: Iron Meteorite Classification. Part II (/Mar97/msg00067.html)
4) Re: Iron Meteorite Classification. Part I (REPOST)
(/Mar97/msg00068.html)
Regards, Bernd
>>