[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Meteors - excuse for UFO sightings?
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: Meteors - excuse for UFO sightings?
- From: Robert S Verish <Robert.S.Verish@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Date: 29 Jun 1998 18:45:54 -0700
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:47:01 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"rh6gYC.A.qRF.cNEm1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; 0710935984352413-Proteus]
- X400-Originator: Robert.S.Verish@jpl.nasa.gov
- X400-Received: by mta Proteus in /c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; Relayed; 29 Jun 1998 18:45:54 -0700
- X400-Received: by /c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/; Relayed; 29 Jun 1998 18:45:54 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
From the back page of the LA Times (on a slow news day):
Monday, June 29, 1998
Scientific Panel Urges Study of UFO Sightings
Phenomena: First review of controversial topic in almost 30 years
cites physical evidence. Committee acknowledges `giggle factor.'
From the Washington Post
Some reported UFO sightings have been accompanied by unexplained
physical evidence that deserves serious scientific study, an
international panel of scientists has concluded.
In the first independent scientific review of the controversial topic
in almost 30 years, which was directed by physicist Peter Sturrock of
Stanford University, the panel emphasized that it found no convincing
evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence or any violation of natural
laws.
But the panel cited cases that included intriguing and inexplicable
details, such as burns to witnesses, radar detection of mysterious
objects, strange lights appearing repeatedly in the skies over certain
locales, aberrations in the workings of automobiles, and radiation and
other damage found in vegetation.
The 50-page review, which is being released today, asserts that
scientists might learn something worthwhile if they can overcome the
fear of ridicule associated with the topic and get funding for
research to try to explain the occurrences.
"It may be valuable to carefully evaluate UFO reports to extract
information about unusual phenomena currently unknown to science," the
report stated, adding that such research also could improve
understanding of, and in some cases debunk, supposed UFO events.
For example, earth science researchers have eventually accepted
several phenomena "originally dismissed as folk tales," including
meteorites and certain types of lightning, the panel noted.
The findings are from a four-day workshop in
Tarrytown, N.Y., followed by a second three-day meeting in San
Francisco, both held last fall. The results are published in the
current issue of the Society for Scientific Exploration, which was
established by Sturrock.
The inquiry involved scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cornell and Princeton universities, the universities of
Arizona and Virginia, and institutions in France and Germany, among
others. A panel of nine physical scientists analyzed presentations by
eight UFO investigators, who were encouraged to present their
strongest evidence. The project was funded by Laurance S. Rockefeller
through his LSR Fund because of a belief, the report said, that "the
problem is in a very unsatisfactory state of ignorance and confusion."
The panel suggests that the scientific community has suffered a
failure of curiosity regarding UFOs. Despite an abundance of reports
over the last 50 years "and despite great public interest, the
scientific community has shown remarkably little interest in this
topic."
Asked about the conclusions, a sampling of scientists and officials
outside the panel expressed surprise and some anxiety that a topic
with such a high "giggle factor" might be reincarnated for serious
study, possibly further blurring the lines between legitimate research
and the "lunatic fringe." Some said they would never comment on the
touchy topic, and some said they would reserve judgment until they had
read the report.
TO UN-SUBSCRIBE:
----------------
Send an email To:
meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject field of your
email. That's all there is to it!
----------------
Thank You