[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: archie / peekskill / canada
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: archie / peekskill / canada
- From: Ron Baalke <BAALKE@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 16:35:06 GMT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 12:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"xEfnlB.A.5ZG.sfoj1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
>>>If the pieces were left in the street, there could be a case for "public
>>>domain," ETC, ETC, ETC.
>>That is a good point. Let me provide this example. If your park your car
>>in the street, does your car become "public domain", and anyone can now claim
>>your car? If the car parked on the street was taken without the owner's
>>permission, would this not be called car theft? If your kids
>>are playing with their toys in the front yard, and leave a few of
>>them on the sidewalk, do the toys become "public domain", and anyone
>>who is walking by can pick them up and claim them as their own?
>peekskill - ron's weak analogous situations aside--as well as his penchant
>for glibbly speculating on "the law"--
Hi Darryl,
This is a very valid example. If is a weak analogy, then please
provide any counter examples or anything else that shows it be a weak
analogy.
>THE FACT IS that nearly every little
>broken piece of tail light was recovered with Michelle Knapp's blessing
I agree with you completely. The car pieces do belong with Michelle Knapp, and
you have now established the fact that she wanted to keep them.
>prior to the time that Mr. Garson picked up a neglected piece of refuse in
>the street.
Nevertheless, even the neglected pieces still belong to Michell Knapp.
With her blessing, of course.
>as it regards Mr. Garson's role in the aforementioned, i found it both
>grotesque and bizarre that ron saw fit to defame Mr. Garson--a subscriber's
>father--this past friday by suggesting he was a thief.
Are you advocating the taking personal property without permission
is proper?
>canada - let us please not address (i.e., "speculate") about this further
>until ron advises us on the number of non-scientific meteorite export
>permits that have been issued by the canadian authorities in recent years.
>okay?
I was merely pointing out the fact that the Canadian Act does allows
for the export of meteorites from Canada. Take a look at this page:
http://www.pch.gc.ca/culture/heritage/mcp_e.htm
Ron Baalke