[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vugs, Vacuoles, and Voids
- To: meteoritelist <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Subject: Re: Vugs, Vacuoles, and Voids
- From: JJSwaim <terrafirma@ibm.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 19:28:55 -0400
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: terrafirma@ibm.net
- Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 19:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"hvJz2.A.B1B.06ah1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Hello Gene, Steven and List,
Gene wrote:
"Who knows, maybe
Jules Verne was right and the center of the Earth is hollow?"
I know you are kidding Gene, but since there is a distinction between
asteroids and planets in large part based on the core characteristics
of planets, let's now take the reverse position and see if the Albion
might not indeed have been a part of the core of Planet X, now known as
the Asteroid Belt, before it got belted , so to speak. I never give
up on this one.
Best regards,
Julia
Received: from yoop.oz.cc.utah.edu [155.99.2.5] by in6.ibm.net id 888611325.94572-1 ; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 20:28:45 +0000
Received: from localhost (lp2690@localhost)
by yoop.oz.cc.utah.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA21492
for ; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:28:43 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:28:42 -0700 (MST)
From: l pomeroy
X-Sender: lp2690@yoop
To: JJSwaim
Subject: re: rock, paper scissors
In-Reply-To: <34F6D749.3659289C@ibm.net>
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, JJSwaim wrote:
> Yo, Loren,
> (A 'kinder, gentler (conster)nation'
>
> Observations:
>
> 1. Things? I can't do all your work for you. You must show some
> effort. 'Things' is substandard even for the simplest observer, say a
> gnat in your nose. (GIN)
>
"plays?" "opportunities?" "allowed falangeal configuration classes?"
Hmm, I'll have to mull this over.
> 2.Your opponent appears to be quite the flake. First he has no
> preferences. Then he's likin' those scissors big time. In my
> experience one's chances of mathematically predicting the actions of a
> flake waffling go out the window. One must rely on the scientific hunch
> theory (SHT) - close enough - the basic SHT if you prefer.
>
Actually the opponents are separate versions of the same person
who are diagonally parked in parallel universes.
> 3. My BSHT says: taking into account the low cerebral functions
> performed by a human flakoid, of the male gender in particular, paper is
> selected less often due to the more 'desirable' agressive gestures
> associated with rock and scissors (actually someone should do a
> scientific study on this). Therefore, is seems more scientific that
> your opponent be changed to 'she' since this would eliminate both the
> gender predilection and yes, the 'flake factor', producing a more random
> sample, hence a more accurate mathematical conclusion. (Assuming she
> does not similarly become addicted to any one predilection)
>
The "opponent" is male and suffers from repressed castration anxiety.
Thus the predeliction for "scissors."
> I have more observations if you're interested.
By all means, fire away.
>
> Honk, jj
> (you can consider that a goose, or a taxi - I meant the latter as I live
> in NYC. )
>
goose? taxi??? I thought it was a racial slur aimed at my
caucasian ethnicity.
Arf!
Loren
Follow-Ups: