[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Meteors - excuse for UFO sightings?
- To: "Meteorite List" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>, "Robert S Verish" <Robert.S.Verish@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Subject: Re: Meteors - excuse for UFO sightings?
- From: "Jim Lamm" <jlamm@netnitco.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 21:15:13 -0500
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: <jlamm@netnitco.net>
- Resent-Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 22:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"mEJxbD.A.LqB.d5Dn1"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
As that colorful modern philosopher, Peg Bundy once stated:
"It would be easier to believe in UFO's if they didn't always land in the
yards of idiots"
Way to go Peg -- Beam me up Scotty !!
Regards,
Jim Lamm
----------
> From: Robert S Verish
> To: IPM Return requested
> Subject: Meteors - excuse for UFO sightings?
> Date: Monday, June 29, 1998 8:45 PM
>
>
> From the back page of the LA Times (on a slow news day):
>
> Monday, June 29, 1998
>
> Scientific Panel Urges Study of UFO Sightings
>
> Phenomena: First review of controversial topic in almost 30 years
> cites physical evidence. Committee acknowledges `giggle factor.'
>
> From the Washington Post
>
> Some reported UFO sightings have been accompanied by unexplained
> physical evidence that deserves serious scientific study, an
> international panel of scientists has concluded.
> In the first independent scientific review of the controversial
topic
> in almost 30 years, which was directed by physicist Peter Sturrock
of
> Stanford University, the panel emphasized that it found no
convincing
> evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence or any violation of
natural
> laws.
> But the panel cited cases that included intriguing and inexplicable
> details, such as burns to witnesses, radar detection of mysterious
> objects, strange lights appearing repeatedly in the skies over
certain
> locales, aberrations in the workings of automobiles, and radiation
and
> other damage found in vegetation.
> The 50-page review, which is being released today, asserts that
> scientists might learn something worthwhile if they can overcome the
> fear of ridicule associated with the topic and get funding for
> research to try to explain the occurrences.
> "It may be valuable to carefully evaluate UFO reports to extract
> information about unusual phenomena currently unknown to science,"
the
> report stated, adding that such research also could improve
> understanding of, and in some cases debunk, supposed UFO events.
> For example, earth science researchers have eventually accepted
> several phenomena "originally dismissed as folk tales," including
> meteorites and certain types of lightning, the panel noted.
>
> The findings are from a four-day workshop in
> Tarrytown, N.Y., followed by a second three-day meeting in San
> Francisco, both held last fall. The results are published in the
> current issue of the Society for Scientific Exploration, which was
> established by Sturrock.
> The inquiry involved scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of
> Technology, Cornell and Princeton universities, the universities of
> Arizona and Virginia, and institutions in France and Germany, among
> others. A panel of nine physical scientists analyzed presentations
by
> eight UFO investigators, who were encouraged to present their
> strongest evidence. The project was funded by Laurance S.
Rockefeller
> through his LSR Fund because of a belief, the report said, that "the
> problem is in a very unsatisfactory state of ignorance and
confusion."
> The panel suggests that the scientific community has suffered a
> failure of curiosity regarding UFOs. Despite an abundance of reports
> over the last 50 years "and despite great public interest, the
> scientific community has shown remarkably little interest in this
> topic."
> Asked about the conclusions, a sampling of scientists and officials
> outside the panel expressed surprise and some anxiety that a topic
> with such a high "giggle factor" might be reincarnated for serious
> study, possibly further blurring the lines between legitimate
research
> and the "lunatic fringe." Some said they would never comment on the
> touchy topic, and some said they would reserve judgment until they
had
> read the report.
>
> TO UN-SUBSCRIBE:
> ----------------
> Send an email To:
> meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
> with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject field of your
> email. That's all there is to it!
> ----------------
> Thank You
>
TO UN-SUBSCRIBE:
----------------
Send an email To:
meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject field of your
email. That's all there is to it!
----------------
Thank You