[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A Look At The Age of The Earth.
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: A Look At The Age of The Earth.
- From: ALMitt@kconline.com
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 98 07:20:52 GMT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- References: <"LIIgH.A.W8F.GFAz0"@mu.pair.com>
- Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 23:14:30 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"Tiq4oB.A.Qh.e1Az0"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Hi Frank,
Welcome back! I thought one means of measurement was that of Al26, turning into
Mg26 its daughter isotope. This dating is based on the time it takes Mg26 to
fully turn from one form to the other. The cause of the alteration is cosmic
rays bombarding asteroid material and passing through it. Although I tend to
accept the old age theory, what troubles me is how do we know that cosmic
bombardment has always been the same frequency. Could it have been double,
triple or even hundreds of folds more in the past. If so could there be error
in the generally excepted age we now except? Of course the question is the same
for all isotopes used in dating now a days. Could a super nova or nova event
gives us the wrong sense of time?
This is a pretty rough question that was asked without digging into my library
so would appreciate everyone excepting my drift even though I might be off on
the particulars.
By the way, would enjoy hearing of your adventures if you would care to share
them with us here. Did you do any meteorite hunting? Did you go and see any
collections.?
--AL
Follow-Ups: