[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Unidentified subject!

Interesting question. In reality, every photograph is a picture of the
past, it is just when the time scale increases to the point where we become
interested, we then ask the big questions.

All astronomical pictures are of the past with their age as the time it
took light to reach the photographer. 0.9c is still sublight speed so
Einstein's calculations hold. As also is predicted, the relative time
"slowing" would come into play just as it does with all relative motion,
but the large proportion of relative slowing does make the question more
intriguing.

Although a MERLIN "photograph" may capture a moment of time in the past,
I'm not sure what to do with it unless a relative time can be deduced for
the image for comparison purposes.  I am also assuming that the 0.9c speed
is rather short lived. If this phenomenon is long-lived, you may be onto
something big since any information gleaned from the gas could represent
brand-new information from an so-far untapped source.

Just my thoughts too,

Martin


> Since MERLIN, the acronym for the Multi Element Radio Linked
>Inerferometer Network, seems to have uncovered the fact that matter being
>sucked into a black hole can release very hot gases at speeds greater than
>90% that of the speed of light, my question is, given the close proximity
>of these heretofore apparently trapped gases to the black hole (GRS1915), 
>at what speed might they have  initially been 'set free'?   The massive
>gravitational pull exerted by the black hole must have greatly reduced
>their escape.  What does this do to Einstein's notion that nothing can
>exceed 'c'?  Does this mean what MERLIN captured is a possible photograph
>of time travel into the past?