[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Lagrangian Points
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Fwd: Re: Lagrangian Points
- From: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 17:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"rYd7eB.A.7wE.-S141"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
---"E.P. Grondine" wrote:
>
>
> Loose copy of original sent to Gene
>
> Hi Gene -
>
> > Outgassing of hydrogen is a very slow and gradual process. It
doesn't
> > happen in bursts.
>
> While the outgassing is slow, more than hydrogen outgasses. Perhaps
> some of it then accretes at the L points?
>
> > Earth life will evolve to the new atmosphere, just as
> > it always has.
>
> I agree that life will evolve, until there is no
> atmosphere left. But as that is probably billions of years away,
> there's no immediate worry.
> >
> > First of all, the 'small comet' theory is being eaten away at by
other
> > researchers, it is beginning to look doubtful.
> Yes, but a lot of the attacks are based on Frank's
> mechanism, not the one proposed here.
>
> >Second, the atmosphere
> > does not outgass in bubbles, it leaks out very slowly.
>
> Didn't say that it did outgas in bubbles.
>
> > And finally, we concluded that biological hazard is not a legitimate
> > reason to oppose manned space flight, just that some quarantine
> might be
> > in order.
>
> I read through the posts to the list; I don't know if everyone agrees
> with your claim to a consensus.
> In the next few days I hope I can get an hour or so
> to entertain everyone with my reminiscence, "ALH84001 and Me."
>
> > I don't believe there is any threat, but NASA is a government
> > agency that serves the People. Therefore, some measures must be
taken,
> > regardless of the very small likelihood of back-contamination.
>
> Actually, what you think or what I think or what
> anyone on this list thinks is irrelevant. The
> biologists at NRC, NAS, NSF, CDC, and ABCWC (I
> think that's the right acronym for the Army guys
> up at Aberdeen) have a strict veto power over any
> proposed NASA Mars missions, or private ones for
> that matter. My guess is that its going to take the
> data from a lot of probes before they'll sign off
> on Mars being dead.
>
> Best wishes -
> Ed
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------