[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Is this your analysis?
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Fwd: Re: Is this your analysis?
- From: "E. Grondine" <epgrondine@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 16:27:32 PST
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 19:29:56 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"TF7YR.A.Pu.aCJj0"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
>From britt@lpl.arizona.edu Fri Dec 5 14:48:18 1997
>Received: by LPL.Arizona.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1)
> id AA24064; Fri, 5 Dec 97 15:47:58 MST
>Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 15:47:56 -0700 (MST)
>From: Dan Britt
>X-Sender: britt@hindmost
>To: "E. Grondine"
>Subject: Re: Is this your analysis?
>In-Reply-To: <19971205214903.24289.qmail@hotmail.com>
>Message-Id:
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
>Dear Ed:
>
>Beats me who wrote that.....the lander is surrounded by ejecta
>from "Big Crater". Basically almost everything at the site smaller
than
>about half a meter in diameter is impact ejecta. JPL has lots of
>people who specialize in getting things wrong....
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, E. Grondine wrote:
>
>> Dear Dr. Britt-
>> Recently there has been a discussion on a meteorite e-forum
about
>> the impact craters near Pathfinder on Mars. A query to JPL and the
>> response follow:
>>
>> >For the last four months I have really enjoyed the postings on
>> >Pathfinder. But there is one thing that seems strange: there has
>> >been very little mention about the effects observed at the
Pathfinder
>> >landing site from the impact that formed the Big Crater.
>>
>> Their reply:
>> >>Pathfinder did see ejecta material from a nearby crater, which was
>> >>reported just 2 days after it had landed on July 6. Also, the
>> >>spacecraft wasn't in a crater, so the odds of finding any effects
>> >>from an impact drops off the farther away you are from the crater.
>> >>Pathfinder only observed surface rocks, and did not dig down into
>> >>the ground to find shatter cones, and probably wasn't close enough
>> >>to the crater anayway.
>>
>> This response was met with some incredulity on the list, in as
much
>> as some estimates have placed the blast that formed the Big Crater at
>> around 35 megatons. A number of people thought that most of the
rocks
>> around Pathfinder looked like ejecta.
>> So, is this your analysis or Dr. McSween's or Dr. Moore's? If it
is
>> not, do you know who is responsible for it?
>>
>> Best Wishes,
>> Ed
>> (E.P. Grondine)
>>
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com